I don’t know much about my maternal great-grandfather. His name
was Wilhelm Waack. He came from Germany, and settled in
Michigan.
Later, he became a reasonably successful businessman, filling an
important social need. He was a bootlegger.
My grandfather, Wilhelm’s son, spoke some German, and could read
it a little. Sometimes, I remember neighborhood boys would ask him
to translate a line from a WWII movie. But it was definitely a
second language for him.
My mother knew only a phrase or two. So it took just three
generations for English to completely replace “the mother tongue”
of the Fatherland.
According to the fascinating book “Do You Speak American?” by
Robert MacNeil and William Cran, German was once a very popular
language in the United States. By the turn of the last century,
1900, it was spoken by one American in 10. Incidentally, that’s
just about how many are now speaking Spanish.
But in 1915, the sinking of the Lusitania led to American
outrage. About this time, many German names were quietly changed.
Stein became Stone.
Even food names changed: Frankfurters became hot dogs.
Sauerkraut became, for some, “liberty cabbage,” anticipating the
“freedom fries” of our own time.
Public schools banned the teaching of German, which I find truly
odd. You would think teaching people to speak the language of an
enemy might prove useful in a time of war. But many schools instead
encouraged students to learn Spanish, because it would be “more
useful in business.”
And come to think of it, you can’t take Arabic in our high
schools today, can you? Nor Mandarin, which has more native
speakers than any language in the world.
At any rate, German is no longer a popular language in our
country. The waves of German immigration are over. Now the top
language group of immigrants is Spanish.
By 2020 (according to some estimates) one in five residents of
the United States will be of Spanish heritage, mostly Mexican. In
Denver, today, about 35 percent of the population is Hispanic; it’s
55 percent in the public schools. Twenty percent of Denver
residents speak Spanish at home.
This worries some people. Hence the “English only”
movement.
Linguists have been studying assimilation rates of Hispanic
immigrants, and have found something surprising. It’s just like the
Germans. Within three generations, the children don’t speak Spanish
anymore.
Why then, is there such growth of Spanish newspapers, radio
shows, and TV channels?
Because the immigration continues. People who stay in this
country get assimilated, but there are a lot of new arrivals, still
in the first wave of the language group, like my
great-grandfather.
What does the issue of immigration have to do with
libraries?
For one thing, our state legislature is talking about some
anti-immigration measures, perhaps including the denial of public
services to illegal immigrants. It’s hard to know what that might
mean.
Will it be OK for libraries to buy Spanish language
materials?
Will it be all right to let non-native people learn English
through the library’s volunteer-based English as a Second Language
tutoring program?
I hope people remember that the public library is not actually
charged with immigration enforcement. We do, however, greatly
assist in the education of new citizens.
I hope people also can support the idea that we need more
foreign language materials in our schools and libraries, not fewer.
English literature, and American literature, are rich and deep. But
there are other world literatures, and most of us know nothing
about them.
Personally, I’m opposed to some new form of linguistic
Prohibition. The idea reminds me of Bradbury’s “Fahrenheit 451,” a
book that was about, among other things, people who smuggled
forbidden texts. These people were known as
“bookleggers.”
History is a circle.